The Individual Experience in a World of Categories :: Sociology Sociological Essays

The Individual Experience in a World of Categories Lakoff and Johnson contend for a typified mind, saying that our classes depend on how we experience the world through our bodies. As per this hypothesis, because of their various life structures, people would encounter the world distinctively and their classes would be intrinsically unique. Likewise, it would be normal that all ladies would have similar classes. Our class and our conversations have exhibited a decent variety of assessments and techniques for arrangement that invalidate this piece of Lakoff and Johnson's contention. I feel that Lakoff and Johnson were right in saying that the classifications we structure are a piece of our experience (Lakoff and Johnson 19). Be that as it may, what they fail to factor into their investigation of the manner in which people sort is the distinctions of every individual experience. Classifications and their implications depend on a person's very own insight into the world, and that is the reason no classification implies the very same thing for more than one person. I need to inspect the classifications of race and sexuality in Moraga and Delany to show the centrality of the individual experience and its immediate association with classes. Likewise, I need to propose that race as other is more risky than sexuality to one's very own personality. Delany's Repugnance/Perversion/Diversion presents us with a progression of upsetting stories. They all begin inside Delany's life, however his explanation behind picking these specific stories is correctly on the grounds that they are unique (Delany 125). Indeed, even inside one's own individual experience, there is a uniqueness to occasions. The classification gay doesn't imply that the people who distinguish themselves as a feature of it will share a comprehension of all that it has intended for one individual to guarantee this name for himself/herself. Delany recognizes that the ID with others that classifications make is in a manner bogus, even the similitudes are at last, to the degree they are living ones, a play of contrasts (Delany 131). He underlines that a significant part of the sexual experience stays outside of language. No everything will be shared, not all things can be. A person's excursion to asserting his/her own personality is dug in the individual excursion, in ev ents both trademark and strange. Be that as it may, possibly these unique stories are not as strange to his experience as Delany accepts. It is reality that they are to be sure a piece of Delany's understanding as a gay man, and he says himself that there is no widespread gay experience.